Buying groceries in bulk is better for the environment, right? That's what I am telling myself because after one trip to Sam's Club for groceries and other essentials, I am out $400. There goes that paycheck! I didn't realize saving money would cost so much. Luckily, the cost will eventually be split between me and my other three roommates, but as an initial payment it was quite a lot.
Only a fraction of the total, which filled the back of a jeep. |
While I was loading all the various foods and toiletries onto the conveyor belt, though, I had to wonder. How can all of this pure consumption be good for the environment? It is hard to see exactly how much extra we need just to live in a college apartment when you buy it in small quantities over time. When you buy a month or two's worth all at once, it really hits home. If I need 48 rolls of toilet papers and 10 containers of Clorox wipes to survive, I don't think I could make it in the wilderness. Then again, all of these supplies originally came from nature at some point. We have just diluted them and morphed to until they no longer resemble anything natural. It sort of proves how much we have separated ourselves from the wilderness.
Wow! That's a lot of stuff and I'm sure you were very careful in your shopping and didn't buy anymore than is necessary to "survive". Your others savings in buying this way is in fewer vehicle trips and hence CO2 into the atmosphere. Don't forget, this wilderness is (or should be) as much about where we live as about some remote, mystical place "out there" somewhere that doesn't really exist (Recall Thoreau, "is it not a maimed and imperfect nature that I am conversant with"). On a more down to Earth (sorry) level, I'm not suggesting you run right out and do this, but try investigating some of the newer, less toxic, more biodegradable cleaning products and write about what you learn. I have some links on my Angel site under RESOURCES/Course Resources/Best Practices and Sources for Sustainability
ReplyDelete